morphles wrote:We already have no allied victory to test the impact on allilances thus I very strongly disapprove such measures.
Corbeau wrote:What exactly does this mean? You give tech to someone and you lose it yourself?
Major Nimrod wrote:Although I don't agree with all the points, I do have to agree with the general spirit of Morph's latest comments: techloss, upkeep, etc.. is all just plain silly. Whatever the reason, I can't see the benefit; only negatives come out of any such discussion. Or at the very least, the negatives outweigh the positives. Just because a setting exists, doesn't mean it's good for the game
ifaesfu wrote:To be able to choose so many percentages in this poll and the receiving one can give "bad" outcomes. All below 60-70% is bad from my point of view.
Anyway, it doesn't matter. It seems most players like tech sharing, so no problem.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest